<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanford Okay&#8217;s Google Book Search Agreement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aboutfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/stanford-okays-google-book-search-agreement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aboutfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/stanford-okays-google-book-search-agreement/</link>
	<description>Helping freelance writers make more money with their writing by Anne Wayman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/stanford-okays-google-book-search-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-10281</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutfreelancewriting.com/?p=6158#comment-10281</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lori... some thoughts... digitizing books doesn&#039;t always mean letting go of print editions, at least not yet. Google&#039;s project seems to include computers as well as ebook readers... well I dont&#039; know what they are doing about readers... but they are planning on giving one(!) computer to every (?) library so the library has access. But some sort of digital divide will exist.

It&#039;s the single company that gets me and with the recent Supreme Court madness continuing the view that corporations (which don&#039;t die) are persons this country is on the edge of the original definition of fascism which apparently was, more or less,  government by corporations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lori&#8230; some thoughts&#8230; digitizing books doesn&#8217;t always mean letting go of print editions, at least not yet. Google&#8217;s project seems to include computers as well as ebook readers&#8230; well I dont&#8217; know what they are doing about readers&#8230; but they are planning on giving one(!) computer to every (?) library so the library has access. But some sort of digital divide will exist.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the single company that gets me and with the recent Supreme Court madness continuing the view that corporations (which don&#8217;t die) are persons this country is on the edge of the original definition of fascism which apparently was, more or less,  government by corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutfreelancewriting.com/2010/02/stanford-okays-google-book-search-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-10264</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutfreelancewriting.com/?p=6158#comment-10264</guid>
		<description>Anne, I&#039;m so glad to hear your take on it. I join you in the unease. Frankly, I hate the idea of digitizing books. It segregates those who can afford e-book readers from those who cannot. 

I worry about what will happen to free libraries if they are forced to digitize because print books have disappeared. Most are hanging by their teeth now. Add expensive readers that will undoubtedly go missing and it&#039;s just a recipe for disaster.

I worry about any one company or conglomerate of companies owning the rights to our reading material. But I think the social effects of this far outweigh the rest. I&#039;d hate to think Johnny can&#039;t read because his family can&#039;t afford the e-readers.
.-= Lori´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WordsOnThePage/~3/exuR9TxOrh0/listen-up.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Listen Up!&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne, I&#8217;m so glad to hear your take on it. I join you in the unease. Frankly, I hate the idea of digitizing books. It segregates those who can afford e-book readers from those who cannot. </p>
<p>I worry about what will happen to free libraries if they are forced to digitize because print books have disappeared. Most are hanging by their teeth now. Add expensive readers that will undoubtedly go missing and it&#8217;s just a recipe for disaster.</p>
<p>I worry about any one company or conglomerate of companies owning the rights to our reading material. But I think the social effects of this far outweigh the rest. I&#8217;d hate to think Johnny can&#8217;t read because his family can&#8217;t afford the e-readers.<br />
.-= Lori´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WordsOnThePage/~3/exuR9TxOrh0/listen-up.html">Listen Up!</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Hyper cache file: 2128653ce110f0a1c5c4b816d7389792
Cache created: 09-02-2012 19:02:54
HCE Version: 0.9.8
Load AVG: 25.24(5)
-->
